Ap Bio Lab Eight Population

The great cleansing of the parliament. V-DAY?? Information

Hello, genuine sons of the network. Now we will try to analyze one of the three proposals that the great comedian claimed during the v-day, even as I am here to write a post, analyze them all 3.
- inelegibilità of all the parliamentary convicts
- directly elected by citizens
- maximum level of 2 terms of office for MPs

In my humble opinion, it was all a waste of breath and energy, and not because despite the consensus stolen from the almost pseudocomico the situation remained unchanged, but because the 3 proposals could have been easily reduced, simplified and summarized in 2. Let me explain:
is natural to think that people agree with the thought of Cricket, and then they do not want parliamentary preceded the trial behind him, would be reluctant to give preference to those same MPs. With direct preferences and then by the citizens, it follows that those people will not have the requirement for eligibility, however, because will have little choice.
The same thing applies to the proposal 3: the citizens in favor of this initiative when they will face a candidate grandfather, easily turn their gaze elsewhere, to younger subjects, and increasingly through direct election, would eliminate the so-called "journeyman policy." Deciding how to not be able to express freely express their preference for this type of parliament, leaving the decision to the party secretaries.

Finally, keeping only the second, while leaving each person free to stand apart from its history, the situation, however, relates to a healthy democratic decision. THIS 'DEMOCRACY!

That said, I would like to point out my point of view in front of this initiative:
serious crimes, with a lot of sentences in third grade, there are. No denying it. This in effect leaves reflect a lot, smoking is the brain, is shocking in every respect.
is very different in reality the proposal of Cricket which "preclude" the parliamentary road to any person with a final sentence or awaiting trial. The chilling thing for me at least. First of all I remember from the list that has beautifully shown pseudocomico around Italy with all the names and surnames of those condemned also includes those with convictions really of little weight, but even worse, with convictions for libel. Defamation by definition has always been the condemnation of the anti-popular story, as they often collided with the freedom of opinion. A classic example is the story of Lino Jannuzzi.
Several times in fact happened is that individuals, with their statements, have touched leading figures and important. After that were deemed inconvenient and therefore unreported. Finally, for lack of evidence to the detriment of the persons against whom the statements had been made, the process ends with convictions for defamation.
Now, it's good to clarify some points, first of all generalize that the thought is never good, especially if we are turning to persons appointed to political office.
In other words, not all people are truly innocent or acquitted "little angels", as not all those sentenced are in fact wrong. Maybe it legally, but in practice the findings may be different. So one thing is to prevent people with questionable past can harm our country, another to say that a person with, for example, a conviction for manslaughter because he hit a pedestrian with his foot on the strip, should not contribute to political of our country.
The instrument of foreclosure for condemnation, could make it to blackmail some people. In the "power struggle" was nothing to prevent any corrupt judge to remove some people from the square with a small condannuccia just to get in exchange for some favor from political rivals. WE LOOK TO THE GENOVESE! We must take account not only good ideas and good thoughts, even a good chunk of rotting of our society.

Finally I want to remember the many historical figures, the great geniuses who have been convicted in any case: from Socrates, Pasolini, Gramsci Caravaggio, etc. etc..

EVEN GESUUUUUUUUUUUU'!!!!!!!! (Which I do not want;)

This, ladies and gentlemen, it is not clean, meets!

Cellebrite Ume 36 Pro Upgrade

the "Genovese" Introduction

Hello again dear genuine sons of the network. This time I would like to bring to your attention a recent statement from the blog of pseudocomico of how the SIG. Grillo conceives information:

" The next V-Day will be dedicated to information, I'm deciding the date. We will ask two things: - the abolition of public funding to publishing-the abolition of the Journalists. Stay tuned. "

not know about you, I can not predict the reactions that this declaration may give rise to readers, but personally, in all sincerity, I confess that I have come chills and the blood is frozen.
The two hypotheses are: 1) after Beppe Grillo V-day has a swelled head and wants to bring out problems of which he is totally ignorant and incompetent by being ridiculous.
2) after every V-Day Beppe Grillo decided that I probably should go back to doing what they were slightly more talented, or the comic, the court jester, the fool in high words.

Grillo to be funny is funny about this is nothing to say, as no doubt the comic than enough, but in both cases first set out the truth that emerges is that something inside him pseudocomico after V-day is irrevocably changed.
analyze in depth the proposal of Liguria, with a look to the future, trying to predict what might be the consequences of such an initiative.
It 's definitely unfair and may burn the brain (and not only probably) in the knowledge that all Italians from income tax and our taxes, resulting survival of virtually all publishing. It certainly reflect the fact that their taxes a citizen is forced to fund both "SAILING" and "free" or "Il Giornale", but let's think for a second what would happen if public funding from a newspaper overnight were cleared.
Prime axiom: any type of public or private funding needs to survive
second axiom: publishing also falls into the category of "activities" and therefore needs income to survive
It follows that, not being able to rely more on public funding, as proposed by the Genoese, the newspapers will be forced to turn our gaze to other sources, which will no doubt be in the private sector.
The papers will then in the hands of advertisers, businesses and corporations, even foreign ones, because in the struggle to survive any helping hand becomes a precious treasure. Then the information will assist
DEATH, as has often happened in America, where we will have in front of newspaper pages 2 to 10 will be devoted to news, and the other 8 to promote and sponsor advertising.
This, ladies and gentlemen, genuine Internet users, it is pure Demagogues and simple!
E 'much better than a large party where information can be guaranteed a minimum competition between poles, that information entrusted to groups of companies, creating centers of power that would make it even more blackmail than it already is, the policy itself .

Will Apex Affect A Drug Test

Hi all healthy and genuine sons of the network ..
I should point out this introduction with some of the main aims of this new blog.
First, as you can see here on these words the image of perhaps the most despicable populist of our times, and I dare someone who has used one of the polluted most beautiful technologies just as the online world, with a endless stream of crap, not allowing any dialogue and no opposition.
Dear Beppe a bit 'of sound Par Condicio for you not can certainly hurt you .. for months if there is a hate campaign against the policy against Mastella and in particular, give me a reason why you should be excluded just you ..
begin to clarify for all Internet users "Polluted" by this boss demagoguery that the network is not 'a pseudo comic invention of this merits and we do not give unnecessary and unfounded ideas to a person so poor that he was forced to illustrate them more violent and antiplurale you can imagine ..
certainly has been able to see a possibility in this vehicle information, has been able to pass across the board all the various political salons and the various Bruni sale of this situation and I have to admit, God forbid ..
But what are the aims? Let's say then that Beppe Grillo NOT 'blogs and blogs are not Beppe Grillo . Blogs are only one of many tools and have existed long before cricket learn to turn on a computer. Although Genovese is trying to monopolize the management of a large part of all information relating to the political world on the web, directing them to places very little production, well, had not yet come to terms with this new initiative .. Beppe Grillo I hate you!
From now on I will try to highlight various posts with all the garbage that he is transmitting on the network claiming to innovation and all the flaws and contradictions of his thought ..
The wisdom of my country always told me: "Do not trust people who make you laugh" .. and it is so .. Dear genuine internet .. I'm sure anyone visiting this blog represents the good part of the web, the healthy and the one that has really hope in the future and does not rely on a simple defeatism .. Boys, this gentleman is very dangerous for our country!